The Educational Leadership Ed.D. is characterized by three primary Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs):
- SLO 1 – Content Area in Educational Leadership
The primary goal is to prepare educational leaders to acquire knowledge, establish beliefs, and develop skills in the following areas: Vision for Learning, Culture for Learning, Management for Learning, Community for Learning, Ethics for Learning, Context for Learning, and Internship for Learning. The educational leader (student/candidate) will be able to promote the success of all students in each of these content areas. The student/candidate will also acquire a breadth of knowledge in the historical, philosophical, socio-cultural, and psychological bases for professional education practice.
- SLO 2 – Internship
The student/candidate will be able to interpret theoretically grounded and research based information, adapt to changing situations, make complex decisions, solve problems, and evaluate actions in a professional education setting.
- SLO 3 – Research
The student/candidate will demonstrate a depth of knowledge across the broad discipline of educational research and apply a method of inquiry to their specific content field of choice through established research methods.
Assessment Method(s)
Direct Assessment
All students/candidates admitted to the doctoral program in the Department of Educational Leadership are assessed on a regular basis for each of the SLO outcomes. For SLO 1, preliminary exams and the dissertation defense rubric serve as direct measures of the achievement of content area outcomes. The dissertation defense rubric is completed by consensus of committee members at the time of the student’s/candidate’s defense presentation and includes both the areas of content and research. The indirect measure for SLO 1 includes a self-assessment rubric containing concepts inherent in the ISLLC standards and serves to document progress on SLO 1 for content area outcomes. The self- assessment rating is based on the student’s/candidate’s perceptions of acquisition of knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to successful leadership across the six standards.
For SLO 2, there are two direct assessments used to determine proficiency levels of students regarding standards/objectives set forth by the internship guideline agreements. These assessments include the Field Supervisor Internship Assessment and the University Supervisor Internship Assessment. Every semester a student enrolls in internship hours for credit, the student prepares a plan outlining the standards/objectives for the internship experience that align with selected ISLLC standards in consultation with the field supervisor and the university advisor. The student keeps a log of activities and produces artifacts documenting completion of their learning objectives. The field supervisor rates the student on completion of the goals for the experience and the advisor does the same (as well as providing a course grade for the hours enrolled.) These two assessments serve as formative data to guide student growth in the program with a culminating goal for students to interpret theoretically grounded, research- based information, adapt to dynamic situations, make complex decisions, solve problems, and evaluate actions within the professional education setting.
For SLO 3, two direct measures provide data regarding student/candidate acquisition of knowledge, performances, and dispositions regarding the important area of research. The dissertation defense rubric provides an opportunity for the committee to denote consensus on the student’s knowledge of the procedures used for the identified research paradigm, the demonstration of the skills associated with the research paradigm, and the behaviors associated with the tenets of ethical research (dispositions expected of good research practices.) In addition, the dissertation advisor (major professor) completes an evaluation considering grades in methods courses, observations of performance on the research proposal, level of performance at each stage of the research process, and at completion of the research and defense. Program goals include student/candidate demonstration of knowledge across the broad discipline of educational leadership and the ability to apply a method of inquiry to specific content fields.
Indirect Assessment
An indirect measure for SLO 1 includes the Student/Candidate Exit Report (with ratings for ISLLC related areas of content). At the end of all the internship hours required on the program of study, the university advisor provides a rating on all standards that were addressed during the comprehensive experiences in the field.
The student exit report also includes two sections pertaining to internship experiences which serve as an indirect measure for SLO 2. The student exit report is completed at degree completion. At this time, students are asked to record their perceptions of growth on each of the six ISLLC leadership standards and then asked their perceptions of the degree to which the internship experiences provided opportunities to engage in activities targeted for each of the standards.
For SLO 3, the student/candidate completes a Self-Assessment of Research Skills. This rubric is completed prior to graduation and indicates the student’s/candidate’s overall perception of each element of the research process.
Additional Program Evaluation
The Ed.D. program in Educational Leadership includes established measures to assess program effectiveness for the KSDE/CAEP and highlights program evaluation and effectiveness aligned with KSDE/CAEP standards and expectations for full program accreditation.